You know, I really do think that there are certain areas or conditions when it may be acceptable to "teach for the test". It is assumed here that we are considering standardized tests such as the NJASK, but I think that teachers routinely teach for all of the tests.
- What is a study guide if not a vehicle to teach for the test? Sure, we all say the study guide helps to assist students narrow down the wide range of content and direct their studying; but isn't it really teaching for the test?
- As for the NJASK, I think that teachers teach for the test all year long. Much of their curriculum maps and weekly plans reflect what has been on the test in the past. Teachers re-arrange their teaching to 'fit in' the content they think will be asked on the test.
- Beyond content, teaching the vocabulary of the test is essential.
- Finally, considering the delivery of the test... the expectations of answers through the preferred rubrics and the way in which questions are asked (in bullets, for example) need to be taught to students... in other words teaching for the test.
No comments:
Post a Comment